Ghana Sends U.S. Out of World Cup—Again

It’s taken us a couple of days to get to this past Saturday’s U.S.-Ghana game because we’ve been in transit, and on deadline at the day job, not—we repeat, not—because we’ve been on a three-day bender drowning our sorrows, or because we’ve been curled up in the fetal position since Saturday afternoon. (Not as far as you know.)

But we did take the U.S.’s 2-1 extra-time loss especially hard, for many reasons.

Here are three of them:

1) The World Cup functions as kind of a quadrennial Referendum on the Sport of Soccer in the United States. When the U.S. plays a World Cup match, it’s not only the team’s chances in the tournament that are on the line, but in many real ways, the future of the sport is at stake as well. The U.S. is pretty much unique in this regard. Sure, Italians and Englishmen are disappointed, devastated even, at their national teams’ performances at South Africa 2010, but soccer will continue to flourish in those countries just as it had before the tournament, and the Premier League and Serie A will resume grabbing all the sporting headlines when they start back up in six or seven weeks’ time. It’s a different story for the sport here, and for Major League Soccer.

But if the U.S. wins this game, and then goes on to … sigh.

That brings us to Reason No. 2…

2) The U.S .got the best Round of 16 draw it could possibly hope for, maybe everLandon Donovan said after the game that the team felt it had let “a little bit of an opportunity” slip away. Right. And the Grand Canyon is a little bit of a depression in the surface of the earth: If the Yanks had gotten by Ghana, next up would’ve been a very winnable game with Uruguay for a spot in the semi-freaking-finals of the World Cup. They may never get another opportunity like that again.

3) They had this game! Because of reason No. 1 above, we are usually somewhere between acute anxiety and deep pessimism while watching this team play in a World Cup, but after Donovan tied it from the spot in the 62nd minute and the U.S. started creating more chances, we genuinely believed they were going to win the game. They had the momentum and Ghana seemed to be tiring. This one was there for them.

So what went wrong?

Before the game, we pointed up five areas that could influence the outcome of this game, and the Yanks flubbed three of the five en route to the defeat that eliminated them.

Early Stages

We need to get the Elias Sports Bureau (and possibly the American Psychological Association) on this: Has a team ever given up early goals in three of its four World Cup games—along with allowing an early shot off the crossbar in the fourth?

This was more than a worrying trend—it was downright weird. And no one had an explanation for it.

Let’s review: they conceded a goal to England in the fourth minute, to Slovenia in the 12th, allowed a blast off the bar to Algeria in the sixth, and then in this knockout game against Ghana, gave up a goal in the fifth minute.

WTF, indeed.

They did rally each time, and this past Saturday it looked like they were bound to score the winning goal … until extra time began … and the Yanks reverted to their beginning-of-the-game form: time to give up a soft goal!

In the third minute of extra time, a punt from Ghana keeper Richard Kingson led directly to a goal by Asamoah Gyan, aka Baby Jet (best nickname in the tournament? Best nickname in the tournament), as U.S. central defenders Carlos Bocanegra and Jay DeMerit played a little game of ‘you got him?’ ‘no, you do.’

Ghana’s Athleticism

This had to have been one of the main talking points in the U.S.’s preparation, right? How it’d be important to get the ball off your feet quickly and be precise with your passes because these guys close down spaces faster than your average opponent, etc. etc?

Yet there was Steve Cherundolo on the right flank in the early going, taking his time with the ball and getting stripped. And there was Ricardo Clark giving it away cheaply in the fifth minute—a turnover that led to Ghana’s first goal and cost the Backpost household one apparently antique endtable.

In Clark’s defense, Bradley put him in a tough spot with his pass, and then vacated the space behind him with an overlapping run, leaving him with no cover after the turnover. Click here for some video evidence submitted by Backpost reader Old 27.

Crunch-Time, Extra time, Penalties

Fall asleep at a critical moment down the stretch and it could cost you a game like this. The U.S. did just that on Ghana’s game-winning goal, allowing a punt to fall between its two out-of-position centerbacks and then, well, what did happen after that?

Bocanegra shoulder-bumped Gyan, and when that didn’t knock the player off balance, appeared to give up on the play, stopping his run and—seriously, watch the replay—looking up at the sky while leaving DeMerit to take over and defend the attack on his own. But DeMerit was always behind the play and had no chance of stopping Gyan. Check it out here (third goal, obv):

The U.S. stumbled in three other key departments as well: Lineup selection, goalkeeping, and finishing.

Starting Ricardo Clark was a mistake, and Bob Bradley admitted as much by subbing the player off after half an hour. He said he made the change because Clark picked up a yellow, and that it was “extremely dangerous” for a hustling, tackling central midfielder to be carrying a yellow in a game like this, and that makes sense. But Clark was having a bad game—and he had a bad tournament: two appearances, two errors that contributed to goals against the U.S. (he failed to track Gerrard on the England goal). The U.S. looked much better when Maurice Edu came in.

Tim Howard had an excellent tournament, for the most part, but he was beaten to the near post on Ghana’s first goal, and appeared to be out of position (see above). The second Ghana goal went right over his head—it was a rocket, but it was right at him.

We thought Bradley would start Robbie Findley in this game, and we think it was the right move. He’s the only player on the U.S. roster with the speed to trouble Ghana’s backline, and he did that. But he fell short—well short—in the finishing department, blowing a golden chance in the 35th minute, scuffing his shot into Kingson’s leg from 10 yards.

The U.S. squandered several other excellent opportunities as well, with Jozy Altidore, Benny Feilhaber, and Michael Bradley all failing to finish good to decent chances.

So it was a mixed bag for the U.S. at South Africa 2010: They accomplished their goal of getting out of the group stages, but they missed a golden opportunity to do something unprecedented in U.S. Soccer history.

Next up: What now for Bradley and Co.?

Advertisements

2 comments on “Ghana Sends U.S. Out of World Cup—Again

  1. Chris says:

    Great coverage during the Cup, Backpost. A few thoughts: Not sure how you can defend Findley. This is not a track meet. I don’t think Howard had a nearpost on the first goal, he came right down the middle and only the last touch brought him to one side (horrible defending on that play. I don’t think the game winner came directly from the keeper – I think it was a flukish long ball from defense. Starting Clark and Findley seemed like bad coaching mistakes, but the critical strategic error was how we approached extra time. We have Tim F*cking Howard and they don’t. We should have played for PKs.

  2. abes army says:

    I think Bradley got quite a bit out of a team that had no world cup quality forwards or left back. You can’t expect to get every single decision right. I give him credit for yanking Rico early when that one was going off the rails.

    I think this team got as far as it’s midfield and keeper could carry it.

    That said, I don’t think he wants to keep the job and I don’t think USSF wants him either. I can’t see Bradley landing an EPL job, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he got a Championship level job in England and did well with it.

    For all the criticism of Bradley for not being able to modify formations and tactics, I think that is as much a matter of his players’ tactical inexperience as Bradley’s.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s